The First Step Toward Erasure: Why Removing Pride Flags Should Alarm Us All.
By Kyle Glozier
Disability/LGBT Rights Activist
I keep seeing posts from no doubt right‑wing groups asking people if they support banning LGBT Pride flags in public school classrooms on Facebook. Most people in the comments obviously say, “yes.” I, on the other hand, keep saying, no — you do not truly support education.
I grew up at a time where civil rights were just being
introduced. Yes, we talked about Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, and the
struggles of the Black community. But even as a kid, I understood something
important: civil rights did not begin and end with the 1960s, and they
certainly didn’t cover everyone.
Through my involvement with the disability rights group
ADAPT, I learned firsthand that the fight for community living and ending the
institutional bias in Medicaid isn’t over — not even close. I learned about Ed
Roberts and Wade Blank through oral histories, not textbooks. I met Justin Dart
Jr., Kempt, and Judy Heumann — names the average student will never hear, even
though they shaped the world disabled people live in today.
These leaders weren’t just activists. They were architects
of freedom. They fought for ramps, for access, for dignity, for the right to
live outside institutions. They fought for the idea that disabled people
deserve to be part of their communities, not hidden away.
And yet, despite all that history, despite all that
struggle, despite all the progress we’ve made, I keep seeing posts online
asking whether Pride flags should be banned in public school classrooms.
Every time I see those posts, I think about the civil rights
leaders I grew up hearing about — and the disability rights leaders I met as a
kid. I think about sitting in front of buildings, chanting “Free Our People!” I
think about how every movement for justice has faced the same tactic: erase
the symbols, erase the visibility, erase the people.
When you ban a symbol of inclusion, you are not protecting
children. You are protecting prejudice.
When you remove a sign that says “you are welcome here,” you
are not being neutral. You are choosing exclusion.
And when you silence LGBTQ+ students by stripping away the
one symbol that tells them they are safe, you are not supporting education.
That is what’s happening in Tennessee, and those who are supporting this effort
are supporting fear, bigotry, and discrimination.
So when I saw the recent image circulating online — showing
a Tennessee school board voting to remove Pride flags from all classrooms — I
felt that same ache I’ve felt too many times before. The photo says everything:
people sitting in silence, some holding back tears, one person standing proudly
with the flag that’s now being banned. It’s a snapshot of what happens when
inclusion becomes controversial.
That image reminded me of every movement I have ever studied
or lived through. Whether it was the civil rights marches of the 1960s or ADAPT
activists blocking buses to demand accessible transit, the story is always the
same: when progress threatens comfort, people call it “political.” When
visibility challenges prejudice, people call it “inappropriate.” And when
symbols of belonging appear in public spaces, someone always tries to take them
down.
But education is not about comfort. It’s about truth. It’s
about courage. It’s about teaching students that diversity isn’t dangerous —
it’s human.
When a school board decides that a Pride flag is too much,
what they are really saying is that LGBTQ+ students are too much. They are
saying that safety, empathy, and representation are optional. They are saying
that silence is easier than inclusion.
And that is why I keep speaking up. Because I have seen what
happens when people are erased — whether it is Jewish people being sent to
concentration camps, disabled people locked away in institutions, or queer
students told their identity does not belong in a regular classroom. The fight
for visibility is the same fight, just wearing different colors.
So when I say, “No, you do not truly support education,” I
mean it. Education without full inclusion isn’t education at all. It’s
indoctrination into silence. During the Holocaust, Hitler spread propaganda
claiming that Jewish people were inferior to the rest of society. That message
didn’t stay in speeches or newspapers — it seeped into schools, into textbooks,
into children’s lessons, into everyday conversations inside homes. It taught an
entire generation to see their neighbors as less than human.
That’s what propaganda does. It doesn’t just tell people
what to think — it tells them who is allowed to exist.
And when I see people today demanding that Pride flags be
removed from classrooms, I recognize the pattern. It starts with a symbol. It
starts with a message. It starts with a claim that certain identities are
“inappropriate,” “political,” or “dangerous.” It starts with the idea that
visibility itself is a threat.
But visibility is not the threat. Erasure is.
We’ve seen this throughout history:
- Remove
the symbols.
- Remove
the stories.
- Remove
the representation.
- Remove
the people.
Every civil rights movement has faced this tactic. The
disability rights movement faced it when institutions hid disabled people away
from public view. The LGBTQ+ community faces it when schools try to erase their
existence from classrooms. The Jewish community faced it when propaganda taught
children to fear and hate their neighbors.
The details change. The targets change. The strategy does
not.
When you ban a Pride flag, you’re not protecting children.
You’re teaching them that some people should be invisible. You’re teaching them
that safety only belongs to certain students. You’re teaching them that silence
is the correct response to difference.
And that is not education. That is the first step toward
repeating mistakes we swore we would never repeat.
If we want schools to be places of learning, then they must
also be places of belonging. If we want students to grow, then they must feel
safe enough to be themselves. If we want to prevent the harm history has shown
us, then we must refuse to erase the symbols that tell marginalized students,
“You matter.”
Because the moment we start banning visibility, we start
banning humanity.
We owe it to every student — LGBTQ+, disabled, Black,
immigrant, Jewish, or otherwise marginalized — to remember what history has
already taught us. Erasure is never harmless. Silence is never neutral. And the
moment we start deciding which identities are “acceptable” in a classroom, we
stop educating and start indoctrinating. If we want a future where children
grow up kinder, safer, and more informed than the generations before them, then
we must defend inclusion wherever it appears — even in something as simple as a
flag hanging on a classroom wall. Because inclusion is not a threat. It is a
promise. And it’s a promise we cannot afford to break.
Comments
Post a Comment